GP to BC Compare: Vendor Banking Master Record Tables
There are many differences between Dynamics GP and Dynamics 365 Business Central, but this page highlights the technical differences important to me between the primary master record tables for VENDOR BANKING for carrying over this information to BC. BC is not GP in the cloud, as you can see by the underlying table structure differences for these master records.
Business Central |
|
Dynamics GP |
||||||
Table ID |
Page ID |
Page Name |
Table Columns |
|
Table ID |
Table Name |
Form Name |
Table Columns |
23 |
26 |
Vendor Card |
164 |
|
PM00200 |
PM Vendor Master |
Vendor Maintenance |
109 |
288 |
425 |
Vendor Bank Account |
34 |
|
SY06000 |
EFT Bank Information |
Vendor EFT Bank
Maintenance |
37 |
224 |
368 |
Order Address |
24 |
|
PM00300 |
PM Address Master |
Vendor Address
Maintenance |
28 |
2224 |
2369 |
Remit Address |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
This next table shows the best and most important field matches for the vendor banking records between Dynamics GP and Business Central.
Business Central |
|
Dynamics GP |
|
The Dynamics Mindset |
||
Table 288 |
|
Table SY06000 |
|
GP to BC VENDOR EFT
Field Mapping Notes |
||
Field |
Field Length |
|
Field |
Field Length |
|
**Filtered and Mapped
Fields |
Code |
Code 20 |
|
ADRSCODE |
15 |
|
|
Vendor No. |
Code 20 |
|
VENDORID |
15 |
|
|
Name |
Text 100 |
|
BANKNAME |
30 |
|
|
Bank Account No. |
Text 30 |
|
EFTBankAcct |
35 |
|
BC is 5 char less than GP |
Bank Branch No. |
Text 20 |
|
EFTBankBranch |
15 |
|
|
Bank Code |
Code 3 |
|
EFTBankCode |
15 |
|
BC is 12 char less than GP |
IBAN |
Code 50 |
|
IntlBankAcctNum |
35 |
|
|
SWIFT Code |
Code 20 |
|
SWIFTADDR |
11 |
|
|
Country/Region Code |
Code 10 |
|
CustVendCountryCode |
3 |
|
|
Address |
Text 100 |
|
ADDRESS1 |
60 |
|
|
Address 2 |
Text 50 |
|
ADDRESS2 |
60 |
|
BC is 10 char less than GP |
Transit No. |
Text 20 |
|
EFTTransitRoutingNo |
11 |
|
|
Currency Code |
Code 10 |
|
CURNCYID |
15 |
|
Do not assign currency
in BC unless not functional |
This table shows the Dynamics GP vendor banking master table fields not included in the matched field mapping above.
Many simply don’t fit, or their purpose is conceptually or fundamentally different or incompatible with a clean, straight mapping of data from GP to Business Central.
Dynamics GP |
|
The Dynamics Mindset |
Table SY06000 |
|
GP to BC VENDOR EFT
Field Mapping Notes |
Field |
|
**UN-Mapped Fields |
ADDRESS3 |
|
|
ADDRESS4 |
|
|
BankInfo7 |
|
|
BNKCTRCD |
|
|
BSROLLNO |
|
|
CBANKCD |
|
|
CUSTNMBR |
|
GP table also used for
customers |
CustomerVendor_ID |
|
|
DeliveryCountryCode |
|
|
DEX_ROW_ID |
|
System-generated |
EFTAccountType |
|
|
EFTBankBranchCode |
|
|
EFTBankCheckDigit |
|
|
EFTBankType |
|
|
EFTPrenoteDate |
|
|
EFTTerminationDate |
|
|
EFTTransferMethod |
|
|
EFTUseMasterID |
|
|
FRGNBANK |
|
|
GIROPostType |
|
|
INACTIVE |
|
|
RegCode1 |
|
|
RegCode2 |
|
|
SERIES |
|
|
This table shows the Business Central vendor banking master table fields not included in the matched field mapping above.
Many simply don’t fit, or their purpose is conceptually or fundamentally different or incompatible with a clean, straight mapping of data from GP to Business Central.
Business Central |
The Dynamics Mindset |
Table 288 |
GP to BC VENDOR EFT
Field Mapping Notes |
Field |
**UN-Mapped Fields |
Bank Clearing Code |
|
Bank Clearing Standard |
|
City |
|
Contact |
|
Created At |
System-generated |
Created By |
System-generated |
Email |
|
Fax No. |
|
Home Page |
|
Language Code |
|
Modified At |
System-generated |
Modified By |
System-generated |
Name 2 |
|
Phone No. |
|
RowVersion |
System-generated |
State |
|
System ID |
System-generated |
Telex Answer Back |
|
Telex No. |
|
Use for Electronic
Payments |
|
ZIP Code |
BC has optional Post
Code (table 225, page 367) |
Author’s note and Disclaimer:
Mapping ERP systems is a complex and subjective task for any one person.
Significant differences between GP and BC will require you to learn more deeply about the product to perform a successful implementation.
There is more than one way to map particular fields, but I think you’ll get a lot out of the references provided.
I am not infallible, so let me know if you spot an issue I need to update. I don’t want to present anything factually incorrect here, however how you map your data in real life is up to you.
I needed to know the differences that really matter between the master records in both Dynamics GP and Business Central. I hope you gain value from my analysis and notes.
As I do more BC implementations, and if / when BC changes, I’ll keep this up to date, and make adjustments and add additional notes where needed. I’ll also work on filling in any holes to make this complete because these are MY personal reference pages too.
Some of the tables on the individual pages probably won’t render very well on some mobile devices, but try tipping it horizontally instead!